Right now a TradersPost user can see that an order was sent and filled, but not what the routing actually cost them. Over a month that gap hides real money: slippage against the signal price, orders that never became fills, fees and financing. When a strategy underperforms its backtest, the user cannot tell whether the idea was wrong or the execution was. The request: a per account execution quality report. For a chosen period it would show average slippage versus signal price, fill rate, how long orders sat before filling, and a split of realized P&L into strategy edge, slippage and costs. Read only data, nothing that changes how orders are sent. This matters most for funded and evaluation accounts, where a failed challenge usually gets blamed on the strategy and repeated at the same cost. It would also give support a factual answer when a user says their fills feel bad. I run this analysis on my own book today and would be glad to share a sample report if that helps when the idea gets reviewed.